Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Arriola et al v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2017cv00100
Plaintiff:
Antonio Arriola , Keath Bramblett , Christopher Hopper and others
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky , Commonwealth of Kentucky Cabinet for Justice and Public Safety , Commonwealth of Kentucky Corrections Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Doe v. Brown et al
as 3:2015cv00014
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
J. Michael Brown, Ray Larson and Larry S. Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Brown v. Pocket Kings, Ltd. et al
as 3:2014cv00027
Plaintiff:
J. Michael Brown
Defendant:
Pocket Kings, Ltd., Microgaming Software Systems Limited, Isai Scheinberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Adams et al v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2014cv00001
Plaintiff:
Oscar Adams and Michael Knights
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky , Kentucky Justice and Public Safety Cabinet , Kentucky Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Quality Restaurant Concepts, LLC et al
as 6:2013cv00227
Plaintiff:
Asia Adams , Lisa Amador , Kochshina Borden and others
Defendant:
Quality Restaurant Concepts, LLC and Nathan Bunger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Gamble v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 5:2013cv00308
Plaintiff:
Bennie L. Gamble, Jr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Corrections Corporation of America, Kentucky Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Campbell County, Kentucky et al
as 2:2013cv00054
Plaintiff:
James Michael Brown
Defendant:
Campbell County, Kentucky, Greg L. Buckler, James A. Daley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Odom v. Brown et al
as 0:2012cv00014
Plaintiff:
Glenn D. Odom, II
Defendant:
J. Michael Brown, Gary Beckstrom, Joseph Meko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
