Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Forte et al v. AT&T Phones et al
as 5:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Joe Forte, Cecil Guye, Tyrese Wimberly and others
Defendant:
AT&T Phones and Hopkinsville, KY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Salyers v. Robey
as 4:2023cv00045
Petitioner:
Cecil W. Salyers
Respondent:
Amy Robey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Valentine et al
as 3:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Morris Richard Edwards
Defendant:
Anna Valentine, Wellpath Health Care Services, Christina Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cecil v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00574
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott Cecil
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Franklin v. Clark et al
as 3:2022cv00555
Plaintiff:
Matthew Cecil Franklin
Defendant:
Dwayne Clark and Greg Fisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salyers v. Robey
as 4:2021cv00061
Respondent:
Warden Amy Robey
Petitioner:
Cecil W. Salyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cecil et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv00117
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Cecil and William Cecil
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cecil et al v. United States of America
as 3:2021cv00083
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Cecil and Kevin Cecil
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Calhoun v. Louisville Metro Government et al
as 3:2020cv00857
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Government, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Kentucky Commission on Human Rights and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Snowden v. Kiper et al
as 3:2020cv00720
Plaintiff:
Cecil Snowden, IV
Defendant:
Timothy Raeber and Major Keith Kiper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
