Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Rawlings & Associates PLLC v. Yung et al
as 3:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Rawlings & Associates PLLC
Defendant:
Andrew Yung and Yung Keithley LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rawlings & Associates, PLLC et al v. Archer Systems, LLC
as 3:2023cv00242
Plaintiff:
Rawlings & Associates, PLLC and Lowey Dannenberg P.C.
Defendant:
Archer Systems, LLC
Interpleader:
MSP Recovery Services, LLC, MSP Recovery, LLC, MSPA Claims 1, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rawlings et al v. Marcum et al
as 1:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Lori Rawlings, Adriene Gaddie and Misty Madson
Defendant:
Hack Marcum, Dylan Knifley, Dylan Lile and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Parrish v. Louisville Metro Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00593
Defendant:
E. Troutman, T. Rawlings, B. Baker and others
Plaintiff:
James Walton Parrish, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Hull v. Rawlings Company LLC
as 3:2018cv00772
Defendant:
Rawlings Company LLC
Plaintiff:
Ona Hull
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fm
Blue Cross Blue Shield Association et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2018mc00010
Plaintiff:
Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, Aetna, Inc., Amerigroup/HMS and others
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Respondent:
Mark D. Fischer and Rawlings & Associates, PLLC
Fulmore v. The Rawlings Company LLC
as 3:2017cv00229
Plaintiff:
Ronald Glenn Fulmore
Defendant:
The Rawlings Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
