Cases 21 - 30 of 96
Joseph v. Warden
as 3:2021cv00381
Petitioner:
Ranell Joseph
Respondent:
Jeff Landry and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mitchell v. Vannoy
as 3:2021cv00319
Petitioner:
Corderrius Mitchell
Defendant:
Warden Darrel Vannoy
Respondent:
Darrel Vannoy and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wingard v. State of Louisiana, Department of Public Safety & Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00122
Defendant:
Darrell Vannoy, Ryan Woolfolk, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jarius Wingard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cuevas v. Meyers et al
as 3:2021cv00205
Defendant:
Administrative Board Members Raymond Laborde Correctional Center, Warden Plaquemine Parish Detention Center, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Cuevas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. Louisiana State
as 3:2021cv00182
Respondent:
Louisiana State and Warden
Defendant:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Michael Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jordan et al v. Gautreaux et al
as 3:2021cv00048
Defendant:
John Doe #5, CorrectHealth, East Baton Rouge Parish and others
Plaintiff:
Sahara Claiborne, Shaheedra Jordan and Leiaja Claiborne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Damond v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2020cv00839
Defendant:
Will Mitchell, Edward Peterson, Correcthealth and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. State of Louisiana, Through the Department of Public Safety and Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00425
Defendant:
Asst. Warden Kirt Guerain, Asst. Sgt. Joebert, Sgt. Unknown Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Shawn Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ricard v. Hooper et al
as 3:2020cv00419
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Ricard
Defendant:
Unknown Warden, Unknown Barries and Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Verdin v. Unknown et al
as 3:2020cv00140
Defendant:
Unknown, Unknown Williams, Unknown Hooper and others
Plaintiff:
Soloman J. Verdin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
