Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Hicks et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
TED HICKS and GRAND LAKE LLC
Defendant:
United States, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Col. Cullen Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Mitchell v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
as 3:2021cv00478
Plaintiff:
M.D. CHARLES MITCHELL, II and Charles F. Mitchell, II
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Davis v. United States Army Reserve et al
as 3:2019cv00305
Plaintiff:
Kenneth S Davis
Defendant:
Elizabeth Bohannon, William Norris and United States Army Reserve
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Lewis et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2017cv01644
Plaintiff:
Robert Beard, G. Lewis Louisiana, LLC, Brenda Gayle Lewis and others
Defendant:
Michael Clancy, United States Army Corps of Engineers, United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Lewis et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2017cv00632
Plaintiff:
G. Lewis-Louisiana, L.L.C. and Garry L. Lewis
Defendant:
The United States Army Corps of Engineers, United States of America and Michael C. Wehr
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Davis v. United States Army
as 3:2014cv00415
Plaintiff:
Marcus Davis
Defendant:
United States Army
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Belle Company, LLC et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
as 3:2012cv00247
Plaintiff:
Belle Company, LLC and Kent Recycling Services, LLC
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Harris v. Joiner et al
as 3:2008cv00614
Plaintiff:
Reginald E Harris
Defendant:
James Jim Joiner, Three Unknown Baton Rouge City Police Officers, Baton Rouge City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
