Cases 1 - 10 of 107
Teche Farm Supplies v. Syngenta Corp et al
as 6:2023cv00267
Plaintiff:
Teche Farm Supplies
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta Crop Protection AG and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
H & R Farms II v. Syngenta Corp et al
as 6:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
H & R Farms II
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta Crop Protection AG and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Associated Professional Educators of Louisiana v. E D U 20/20 L L C et al
as 1:2022cv05720
Plaintiff:
Associated Professional Educators of Louisiana
Defendant:
E D U 20/20 L L C, Courtney Dumas and Miranda Britt
Louisiana et al v.Centers for Disease Control & Prevention et al
as 6:2022cv00885
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Arizona, State of Missouri and others
Defendant:
Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Rochelle Walensky, U S Dept of Health & Human Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
Jodey C Arrington, Brian Babin, Jim Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
J M K 5 Texas City L L C et al v. AmRisc L P et al
as 5:2022cv01041
Plaintiff:
JMK5 Texas City LLC, JMK5 Shreveport LLC, J M K 5 Texas City L L C and others
Defendant:
AmRisc L L C, Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, HDI Global Specialty SE and others
Counter Claimant:
General Security Indemnity Co of Arizona, H D I Global Specialty S E and Gneral Security Indemnity Co of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Vintage Realty Co L L C et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London severally subscribing to Certificate No AMR-59283-03
as 2:2021cv04301
Plaintiff:
Vintage Realty Co, Nelson Pointe Apartment Homes, LLC, Vintage Realty Co L L C and others
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, Indian Harbor Insurance Co, QBE Specialty Insurance Company and others
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Subscribing to Policy No AMR-67622-01 et al v. Southwest Louisiana Charter Academy Foundation Inc
as 2:2021cv04342
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. AMR-67622-01, HDI Global Specialty SE, Evanston Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Southwest Louisiana Charter Academy Foundation, Inc. and Southwest Louisiana Charter Academy Foundation Inc
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vintage Realty Co L L C et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Severally Subscribing to Certificate No AMR-59283-03 et al
as 2:2021cv04300
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Plaintiff:
Vintage Realty Co L L C and Country Club Pointe L L C
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Severally Subscribing to Certificate No AMR-59283-03, Indian Harbor Insurance Co, Q B E Specialty Insurance Co and others
Counter Claimant:
General Security Indemnity Co of Arizona, United Specialty Insurance Co, Safety Specialty Insurance Co and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds Londoin Subscribing to Policy No AMR-63188-02 et al v. Bufkin Enterprises L L C
as 2:2021cv04069
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, Londoin Subscribing to Policy No. AMR-63188-02, Lexington Insurance Company, General Security Indemnity Company of Arizona and others
Defendant:
Bufkin Enterprises, LLC and Bufkin Enterprises L L C
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vintage Realty Co L L C et al v. Certain Underwriters Lloyds London et al
as 1:2021cv04298
Plaintiff:
Vintage Realty Co, Magnolia Trace Apartment Homes, LLC, Vintage Realty Co L L C and others
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters Lloyds London, Indian Harbor Insurance Co, QBE Specialty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
