Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Gray v. Carvajal et al
as 1:2016cv01275
Plaintiff:
Willie C Gray
Defendant:
M D Carvajal, Jessica Johnson, Medical Administrators and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Louisiana Division Sons of Confederate Veterans v. Natchitoches et al
as 5:2016cv01142
Plaintiff:
Louisiana Division Sons of Confederate Veterans
Defendant:
City of Natchitoches, Lee Posey, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Louisiana Division Sons of Confederate Veterans v. Natchitoches et al
as 1:2016cv01142
Plaintiff:
Louisiana Division Sons of Confederate Veterans
Defendant:
City of Natchitoches , Lee Posey , John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLaughlin v. Lofton et al
as 5:2016cv00352
Plaintiff:
Roy McLaughlin, Jr
Defendant:
Judy Lofton, Darell Hamiter, Lonnie Nail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rossman v. Dimond et al
as 1:2015cv02844
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossman
Defendant:
James Dimond, John Doe #3, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Thompson v. Ackal et al
as 6:2015cv02288
Plaintiff:
Yulanda Thompson
Defendant:
Louis Ackal, Richard Hazlewood, Paul Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitre v. City of Eunice, et al
as 6:2014cv02843
Plaintiff:
Jana K Pitre
Defendant:
City of Eunice, Rusty Moody, Police Dept City of Eunice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Eskew v. Rapides Parish et al
as 1:2014cv02621
Plaintiff:
Avery Shawn Eskew
Defendant:
Sheriffs Dept Rapides Parish, William Hilton, Pinkerton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sellers v. Ackal et al
as 6:2014cv02486
Plaintiff:
Derrick Sellers
Defendant:
Louis Ackal , Wesley Hayes, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clarkson v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals Co Ltd et al
as 6:2014cv02243
Plaintiff:
Darlene Clarkson
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals Co Ltd , Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda California Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
