Cases 21 - 30 of 120
Spink v. Gaylord et al
as 1:2019cv00900
Defendant:
Greg Snyder, Lynne M. Buday, Steven Hull and others
Plaintiff:
Charise Spink
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. Macatawa Area Express Transportation Authority et al
as 1:2019cv00832
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Chambers
Defendant:
Macatawa Area Express Transportation Authority and Tom Schroff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daunt et al v. Benson
as 1:2019cv00614
Plaintiff:
Anthony Daunt, Linda Lee Tarver, Norm Shinkle and others
Defendant:
Jocelyn Benson and Count MI Vote
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Mims #838715 v. Huss et al
as 2:2019cv00106
Defendant:
Erica Huss, Luke Cody, Tom Prisk and others
Plaintiff:
Doyle Mims #838715
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Pries Supply Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00036
Defendant:
Pries Supply Company, Inc. and Tom Vander Ploeg
Plaintiff:
Neil Baker
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cole #232716 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv00159
Defendant:
Fred Govern, Darrin Viitala, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Otis Lee Cole #232716
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medina v. Leonard et al
as 1:2018cv01111
Defendant:
The Doctors Management Company, The Doctors Company Insurance Services, LLC and Tom Leonard
Plaintiff:
Nathan Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark #222915 v. LaPlante et al
as 2:2018cv00040
Plaintiff:
Aaron Clark #222915
Defendant:
Tom LaPlante, Unknown Burke, Unknown Fredrickson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ClarkWillis #726262 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv00131
Plaintiff:
Julius C. ClarkWillis #726262
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Robert Napel, Tom Prisk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saari #172952 v. Hamel et al
as 2:2017cv00119
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Raymond Saari #172952
Defendant:
Tom Hamel, Unknown Dums, Kathy Olson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
