Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Carr v. Joyce
as 4:2016cv01885
Plaintiff:
Adrian Carr
Defendant:
Jennifer Joyce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frazier et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2016cv01388
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kelly Frazier , Renee Anderson , Darlene Arden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Green et al v. City of St. Louis Missouri
as 4:2015cv01433
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri
Plaintiff:
Percy Green, III , Abram Pruitt, Jr. , Harrith RT Ahmad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Schroeder et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00761
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc. and Greenstone LLC
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Schroeder , Kathleen Porter , Pura Advincula and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr v. Colvin
as 4:2014cv00144
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Darlean Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Marlow v. Missouri Department of Corrections, et al.
as 4:2013cv02293
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Marlow
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Terry Russell, Stanley Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Apothecary Development Corp. et al v. City of Marco Island et al
as 4:2013mc00526
Plaintiff:
Apothecary Development Corp. , Larry G Heine and Susan K Hein
Defendant:
City of Marco Island and Thom Carr
Movant:
Karen Harper
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv01887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harris v. Russell et al
as 4:2013cv00317
Plaintiff:
Jim Harris, Jr.
Defendant:
Terry Russell, Stan Payne, Stan Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
