Cases 31 - 40 of 85
Houston v. Corizon Health Care et al
as 4:2020cv00291
Plaintiff:
Damon Josiah Houston
Defendant:
Corizon Health Care, William D. McKinney and Carl Doerhoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv00069
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Sanders
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections and Corizon Health Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merritt v. Payne et al
as 4:2019cv03101
Defendant:
Sharmila Suri, Corizon, LLC, Warden Stanley Payne and others
Plaintiff:
Shaun Merritt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Corizon Health Service L.L.C
as 4:2019cv02786
Plaintiff:
Clarence Z. Howard
Defendant:
Corizon Health Service L.L.C
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mansfield v. Boyles et al
as 4:2019cv02124
Defendant:
Alana Boyles and Corizon Health
Plaintiff:
David W. Mansfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrill v. City of St. Charles et al
as 4:2019cv01897
Plaintiff:
Michael Terrill
Defendant:
St. Charles County Department of Corrections, Crawford Larry, City of St. Charles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Apel v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv00054
Plaintiff:
Joshua R. Apel
Defendant:
Amy Neale, Pike County Commission, Chris Gamm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nelson v. Lewis et al
as 1:2019cv00108
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, Rebekkah Graham, Southeast Correctional Center and others
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. State of Missouri
as 1:2019cv00099
Plaintiff:
Hosea L. Robinson
Defendant:
State of Missouri, SECC Corizon Health Care Services and SECC Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weaver v. Boyles et al
as 1:2019cv00127
Plaintiff:
Edward Weaver
Defendant:
Alana Boyles and Corizon Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
