Cases 11 - 20 of 122
Rogers et al v. Precythe et al
as 2:2021cv04031
Plaintiff:
Anthony J Barker, Nathan Dabney Rogers, Daniel McCleary and others
Defendant:
MO DOC Dept. of Probation & Parole, Missouri Department of Corrections and Anne L. Precythe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balducci v Missouri Department of Corrections, et al
as 2:2021cv04022
Plaintiff:
Carilyn Balducci
Defendant:
Ryan Brownlow, Missouri Dept of Corrections, John 2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2020cv00734
Defendant:
Jackson County Dept. of Corrections, State of Missouri and Advance Correctional Healthcare
Plaintiff:
Steven A Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whittle v. Camden County Sheriff's Dept. and Corrections Division et al
as 2:2020cv04060
Defendant:
Garton, Oldrich, Sue Unknown and others
Plaintiff:
Timmy Ray Whittle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grieme v. Buchanan Co Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 5:2020cv06052
Defendant:
Federal Communications Commissions, Buchanan Co Sheriff's Dept. and Shawn Collie
Plaintiff:
Jonetta L Grieme
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hill v. Ramey et al
as 2:2020cv04047
Plaintiff:
Charles Christian Hill
Defendant:
Unnamed Employees of MO Dept. of Corrections and Eileen Ramey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory v. Bell et al
as 6:2019cv03393
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Lt. Jones, Officer Ellison and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Lee Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Clay County Sheriff Dept et al
as 4:2019cv00831
Defendant:
Clay County Prosecuting Attorney's Office, Paul Vescovo, III, Rita Fuller and others
Plaintiff:
Dylan Stevens and Dylan J Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akers v. Williams Woods Collage et al
as 2:2018cv04240
Defendant:
Williams Woods Collage and Dept. of Education
Plaintiff:
Sherry Akers
Stacy v. Russell et al
as 6:2017cv03254
Petitioner:
Michael D. Stacy
Respondent:
Jimmie Russell and Taney County Sheriff Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
