Cases 11 - 20 of 185
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rey et al v. Kyne et al
as 2:2022cv04036
Plaintiff:
Justin Todd Rey and Sydney Walters
Defendant:
James Kyne, Stacey Reynolds, Katie Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slocum v. United States Postal Service
as 4:2021cv00917
Plaintiff:
Tammy Slocum
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Hickman v. Hy-Vee , Inc.
as 5:2021cv06147
Plaintiff:
Tammy Hickman
Defendant:
Hy-Vee, Inc. doing business as Tarkio Hy-Vee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. South Central Correctional Center et al
as 6:2021cv03266
Plaintiff:
Jared Williams
Defendant:
South Central Correctional Center, Michele Buckner, Tommy Dodd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company v. Long et al
as 2:2021cv04179
Plaintiff:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
John W. Long, Roy S Paxton, Earl D. Paxton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ranney et al v. KC Township Apartments I LLC, et al
as 4:2021cv00665
Plaintiff:
Castine Ranney and Tammy Ranney
Defendant:
KC Township Apartments I LLC and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lee v. Carter et al
as 4:2021cv00251
Defendant:
Micheal Shaw, Marilyn Sanders, Mayor Quinton Lucas and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent C Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sanders v. Moberly Prince of Palace Free Masons et al
as 4:2020cv00930
Defendant:
Mark Ester, Corizon Health Care Services, Tammi Gittemeier and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph D Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
