Cases 1 - 10 of 470
Keller v. Kerwin et al
as 3:2024cv05042
Plaintiff:
Lucky B Keller
Defendant:
CFO Paul Kerwin and Westlake Financial
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Ozburn v. RTJ Investments, LLC
as 4:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Paul Ozburn
Defendant:
RTJ Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Coleman-Bey v. Hendrickson et al
as 6:2024cv03128
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Coleman-Bey
Defendant:
Michael D Hendrickson, Michael L. Parson, Jeffrey Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanford et al v. Morris et al
as 6:2024cv03124
Plaintiff:
David Sanford, Drew Sanford, Revocable Trust Agreement of David K. Sanford and others
Defendant:
Jim Morris, Paul Freeman, TRock Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Horton v. Mars, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Paul Horton
Defendant:
Mars, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Garrett et al v. Garland et al
as 6:2024cv03076
Plaintiff:
Dwayne M Garrett and Paul Leroy Wickham
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Mike Johnson, Eastern District of Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lampley v. Hopkins
as 6:2024cv03066
Plaintiff:
Harold E. Lampley
Defendant:
Paul Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Rauch v. Centurion Medical Care Provider et al
as 5:2023cv06150
Plaintiff:
Michael Rauch
Defendant:
Centurion Medical Care Provider, Chris Brewer, Paul Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv03334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
