Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Waldrup et al v. Department of the Treasury et al
as 3:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Phil R. Waldrup and Anne B. Waldrup
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Services, D. Setzer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Howell v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
April Mae Howell
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Delbert Hosemann, Secretary of State Michael Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kennedy v. Reeves et al
as 4:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Soloman S. Kennedy
Defendant:
Tate Reeves, Phil Bryant, Lynn Fitch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. United States et al
as 4:2021cv00173
Plaintiff:
Arizona Hall, Jr.
Defendant:
United States, John Does, Phil Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KENNEDY v. BRYANT et al
as 4:2019cv00072
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Haley Barbour and Roger Wruck
Plaintiff:
Solomon S. Kennedy and Soloman S. Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
West v. Bryant et al
as 4:2019cv00021
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Mississippi and Phil Bryant
Petitioner:
Tracy Lee West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2018cv00216
Defendant:
Govenor Phil Bryant and State of Mississippi
Plaintiff:
David Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Lenard v. Bryant et al
as 4:2018cv00221
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Mississippi and Phil Bryant
Petitioner:
Fred Lenard, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KENNEDY v. GILLIS et al
as 4:2018cv00185
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Supt. Emmitt L. Sparkman, Roger Wruck and others
Plaintiff:
SOLOMAN STEVE KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Adams v. Bryant et al
as 1:2018cv00110
Petitioner:
David Adams
Respondent:
Phil Bryant and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
