Cases 131 - 140 of 37,717
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
RLI Insurance Company v. Bailey et al
as 7:2024cv00388
Plaintiff:
RLI Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jeff Bailey, Sheri Bailey and Southern Glass & Mirror of Eastern North Carolina, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ali v. Dexter et al
as 5:2024ct03103
Plaintiff:
Abdulkadir Sharif Ali
Defendant:
Janet M. Dexter, Hunter Fonvielle, Kayla Mercer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Begeny v. The Helps Education Fund, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Dr. John Begeny
Defendant:
The Helps Education Fund, Inc., William Gibson and Erin Banks
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Murdock Ready Mix Concrete v. Ironplanet, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Murdock Ready Mix Concrete
Defendant:
Ironplanet, Inc., Jake Lawson, Brian Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Noonsab v. State of N.C.
as 5:2024hc02090
Petitioner:
Somchai Noonsab
Respondent:
State of N.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hodge v. Cook
as 5:2024ct03104
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Hodge
Defendant:
Dr. Patrick Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Strickland v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Strickland
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
v. Nash County Board Education
as 5:2024cv00258
Defendant:
Nash County Board Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Nash County Board of Education et al
as 5:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Nash County Board of Education, Daniel Colvin, Steven Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
