Cases 11 - 20 of 151
Oxendine v. Moose et al
as 5:2023ct03196
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Oxendine
Defendant:
Timothy D. Moose, Todd E. Ishee, Kimberly D. Grande and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Murphy
as 5:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Karen Murphy
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bashir v. Holzapfel et al
as 5:2023ct03143
Plaintiff:
El-Amin Bashir
Defendant:
Warden William Holzapfel, Unit Manager Chanelle Newsom, Case Manager Gilbert Grimaldo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Thomas v. Pike et al
as 5:2023ct03083
Plaintiff:
Daniel Isaiah Thomas
Defendant:
Hunter Pike, Lt. Willis, Lt. Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Slagle et al
as 5:2023hc02038
Petitioner:
Fred Murphy
Respondent:
Mike Slagle and Josh Stein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Taffe v. Scott
as 5:2022ct03224
Plaintiff:
Timothy Taffe
Defendant:
C/O Scott, Warden King, Warden Scarantino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sneed v. Kreep et al
as 5:2022ct03197
Plaintiff:
Jvon P. Sneed
Defendant:
Detective M.J. Kreep, Magistrate Underwood, Magistrate M.D. Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy Jr. v. City of Fayetteville et al
as 4:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Richard Murphy Jr.
Defendant:
City of Fayetteville and Zachary Hendrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
