Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Jennings v. Flanagan et al
as 5:2021ct03004
Defendant:
William Woodward Webb, Sr., Magistrate Judge Gates, Louise W. Flanagan and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Marquis Jennings and Mustafa Beezy Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodard v. ABM Aviation, Incorporated
as 5:2020cv00602
Defendant:
ABM AVIATION, INCORPORATED d/b/a ABM AIRPORT SERVICES and ABM Aviation, Incorporated d/b/a AMB Airport Services
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Woodard
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Woodard v. Nationwide General Insurance Company
as 7:2020cv00130
Defendant:
Nationwide General Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Patricia Woodard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong v. Sumner et al
as 5:2020cv00331
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
Robert A. Evans, Lamont Wiggins, North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Tovilla v. Woodard et al
as 5:2020ct03199
Defendant:
Nurse K. Dennis, Nurse Dawn and Calvin L. Woodard, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Tovilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodard v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2020hc02003
Petitioner:
James E. Woodard
Respondent:
State of North Carolina and Mr. Millis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Finch v. Wilson County et al
as 5:2019cv00550
Defendant:
John H. Watters, Tony McCoy Owens, Wilson County and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Finch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Wilson County
as 5:2019cv00330
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
Magistrate's Offices, Calvin Woodard, Wilson County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Woodard v. Smith
as 5:2019hc02139
Petitioner:
Michael Leonard Woodard, Jr.
Respondent:
Dee Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Paragon Bank v. Individualized Treatment Solution, LLC et al
as 7:2019cv00055
Respondent:
Individualized Treatment Solution, LLC, Shirley R. Woodard and William E Woodard
Petitioner:
Paragon Bank
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
