Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Cases 41 - 50 of 37,996
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00532
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00359
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00367
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Dragone v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00357
Plaintiff: Dylan Joseph Dragone
Defendant: Advance Auto Parts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Lewis v. Scarantino
as 5:2024hc02123
Petitioner: Jamal Lewis
Respondent: Tom Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Battle v. Wake County Sheriff's Office
as 5:2024cv00353
Plaintiff: Karen A Battle
Defendant: Wake County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Williams v. Kelly et al
as 5:2024ct03159
Plaintiff: Anthony D. Williams and Anthony Davis Williams
Defendant: L.B. Kelly, Ms. Long, John Doe Doctor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McGee v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00352
Plaintiff: Charles McGee
Defendant: Advance Auto Parts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00092
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Stone v. Director of BOP et al
as 5:2024ct03158
Plaintiff: Samuel Stone
Defendant: Director of BOP and NC DAC Prison Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?