Cases 51 - 60 of 211
Clark
as 5:2022hc02023
Petitioner:
Jonathan Wayne Clark
Respondent:
Unknown Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Clark v. Smith et al
as 5:2021ct03323
Plaintiff:
Reginald Clark
Defendant:
Jacqueline Smith, Anna Demeka Bell, Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson et al v. RPS Holdings LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00416
Plaintiff:
Cielo Jean Gibson, Clark Florian, Cora Skinner and others
Defendant:
RPS Holdings LLC d/b/a Capital Cabaret and Phong Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Sharma v. Sapper et al
as 5:2021ct03311
Plaintiff:
Siddhanth Sharma
Defendant:
John Sapper, Demetrius Clark, Felix Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2021ct03187
Plaintiff:
Joshua Clark
Defendant:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown Clark v. Meads et al
as 4:2021cv00097
Plaintiff:
Lillie Brown Clark
Defendant:
Daniel Meads, Robert Morgan, Aaron Lewellyn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Leu
as 5:2021hc02099
Petitioner:
Ernest Franklin Clark
Respondent:
Warden D. Leu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hinton et al v. Cooper et al
as 5:2021ct03021
Plaintiff:
Michael Collins Wilson, Byron McNeely, Kenneth Leonard Dunbar and others
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, John Herring, Erik A. Hooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins et al v. Bladen County Detention Center
as 5:2020ct03331
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilkins, Clifton Hyland, Jerrell Taylor and others
Defendant:
Bladen County Detention Center, Admin. David Shaw, Chief Corbett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee et al v. Hooks et al
as 5:2020ct03307
Plaintiff:
Jose L. Galvin, Isaam Chaplin and Dominique Lee
Defendant:
John Doe 1-2, Erik A. Hooks, D. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
