Cases 51 - 60 of 161
Seelig v. Lassiter et al
as 5:2019ct03230
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Seelig
Defendant:
Kenneth Lassiter, Kimberly D. Grande, Susan Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority v. Ward Transformer Company, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv00304
Defendant:
The State of North Carolina, The United States Environmental Protection Agency, Ward Transformer Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Seelig v. Lassiter et al
as 5:2019ct03217
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Seelig
Defendant:
Kenneth Lassiter, Jeffery Johnson, Kimberly D. Grande and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Lewis v. Thomas et al
as 5:2019ct03191
Defendant:
Mr. Brooks, Mr. Widley, Eddie Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Overton v. Federal Medical Center et al
as 5:2019ct03149
Plaintiff:
Herbert Overton
Defendant:
Dr. Walden Weaver, Federal Medical Center, Lieutenant Bambee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Young v. Carter et al
as 5:2019cv00218
Defendant:
Beam Brothers, LLC No.1, Cross Keys Leasing Co., Inc., Beam Brothers Holding Corp., Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Shelia Denise Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miles v. Hooks et al
as 5:2019ct03094
Defendant:
Erik A. Hooks, Reuben F. Young, Kenneth E. Lassiter and others
Plaintiff:
Hassume S. Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Youngs v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2018hc02306
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Petitioner:
Timothy Wayne Youngs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Young v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2018cv00173
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Amber Lin Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
