Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Hester v. Flowers
as 5:2023hc02030
Petitioner:
Derrick Hester
Respondent:
Warden Flowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
White v. Buffalo et al
as 5:2022ct03188
Plaintiff:
Dwight White and Dwight Edward White, Sr.
Defendant:
Eddie Buffalo, Eric Hooks, Timothy Moose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Brien et al v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company et al
as 5:2020cv00208
Plaintiff:
Leonard Pryor, Candi Ellis, Thomas Keister and others
Defendant:
E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, THE CHEMOURS COMPANY, THE CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hester v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2017cv00174
Plaintiff:
Valerie K. Hester
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Office of Disability Adjudication and Review, Nancy Berryhill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hester v. Colvin
as 7:2016cv00369
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cameron Hester
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Hester v. USA
as 5:2016cv00375
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
William Allen Hester, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wilkins v. Hester et al
as 5:2014ct03322
Plaintiff:
Jamey L. Wilkins
Defendant:
Sgt. Hester, Captain Roach, Irvin Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hester v. DISH Network LLC et al
as 7:2014cv00282
Plaintiff:
Joann Hester
Defendant:
DISH Network LLC and Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jacobs, et al v. General Motors LLC, et al
as 7:2014cv00257
Plaintiff:
Marsha Jacobs , Kristen L. Moore and H. Clifton Hester
Defendant:
General Motors LLC , JTEKT North America, Inc. , JTEKT Automotive Virginia, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hester v. Colvin
as 7:2014cv00163
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cameron Hester
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
