Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Norton v. Columbus County Board of Elections et al
as 7:2019cv00088
Defendant:
Harold Fipps, Jerome McMillian, Columbus County Board of Elections and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Tyrone Norton
Interested Party:
Stella Anderson, Bob Cordle, David Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norton v. Columbus County Board of Elections et al
as 7:2019cv00008
Defendant:
Harold Fipps, Leslie Macrae Doless, Jr., Jerome McMillian and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Tyrone Norton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Thompson et al
as 5:2018ct03336
Plaintiff:
Joseph Earl Clark, II
Defendant:
Dean Locklear, Caroline Riddick-Taylor, Horner M. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baldwin v. Hatcher et al
as 5:2017hc02130
Petitioner:
Floyd Baldwin
Respondent:
Lewis L. Hatcher and Andrea Olinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Norton v. High et al
as 7:2018cv00045
Plaintiff:
Calvin Tyrone Norton
Defendant:
Brian Nicholas High , Lewis L. Hatcher , Western Surety Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills v. Britt et al
as 7:2017cv00193
Plaintiff:
Clint Dale Mills
Defendant:
Donald Britt , Steven Nobles , Columbus County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Human Rights Defense Center v. Hatcher et al
as 7:2017cv00164
Plaintiff:
Human Rights Defense Center
Defendant:
Lewis Hatcher , Clem Thompson and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strickland v. Hatcher et al
as 5:2017ct03055
Plaintiff:
Gary Dean Strickland
Defendant:
Lewis L. Hatcher and Chadbourn Police Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Hatcher et al
as 5:2017ct03040
Plaintiff:
Michael Leroy Daniels
Defendant:
Lewis L. Hatcher and SBI Detective
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Groom, et al
as 7:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
George R. Evans
Defendant:
Michael Groom , City of Jacksonville, N.C. , Christopher Capps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
