Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Pack v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01611
Plaintiff:
Tommy Pack
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Smithfield Fresh Meats Corp. v. Dycos Services, Inc.
as 7:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
SMITHFIELD FRESH MEATS CORP., as Successor in Interest to SMITHFIELD PACKING COMPANY, INCORPORATED and Smithfield Fresh Meats Corp.
Defendant:
DYCOS SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Johnson v. Reid et al
as 5:2021ct03155
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson and Robert H. Johnson
Defendant:
Joseph L. Rayfield, Michael Phillips, Captain Wester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Goodman, et al.
as 5:2021ct03018
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
John Pack, Brett Leverton, Jasper Goodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pack v. NC Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2018ct03319
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety, Warren Correctional Institution, NC Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
John B. Pack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D&H Marketing Group, Inc. v. Signature Food Marketing, LLC et al
as 7:2018cv00141
Defendant:
Charles E McAtee, Signature Food Marketing, LLC, Signature Pack, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
D&H Marketing Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pack v. Unnamed Respondent
as 5:2018hc02140
Petitioner:
Antonio K. Pack
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Phillips v. Smithfield Packing Company, Inc.
as 5:2016cv00834
Defendant:
Smithfield Packing Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Aisha Phillips
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2015cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
