Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Revels v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Mark Anderson Revels
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Revels v. Yankee Freight Systems LLC et al
as 7:2023cv00274
Plaintiff:
Timbrell Nakia Revels
Defendant:
Yankee Freight Systems LLC, N & M Freight, Inc. and James T. Toney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Phillips v. Naphcare, Inc., et al.
as 5:2021ct03099
Defendant:
Christy Bunn, Joseph Lee Hackett, Thomas B. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Denise Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Revells
as 4:2020cv00233
Defendant:
Michael Wayne Revells
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cain-Baarbe et al v. The Syrian Arab Republic
as 5:2020cv00230
Plaintiff:
Paul Gonzalez, Eitan Orbach, Gila Nissenbaum and others
Defendant:
The Syrian Arab Republic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Revel's Barbecue of North Carolina, Inc. v. Cartrette
as 7:2019cv00094
Plaintiff:
Revel's Barbeque of North Carolina, Inc. and Revel's Barbecue of North Carolina, Inc.
Defendant:
Wylie F. Cartrette
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Revell v. Berryhill
as 2:2018cv00054
Plaintiff:
Angel Lynette Revell
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Revels v. USA
as 7:2018cv00075
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Robbie Glenn Revels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Shinaberry v. Town of Murfreesboro, N.C. et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. SEE 2:17-CV-7-F.
as 4:2017cv00033
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Shinaberry
Defendant:
Town of Murfreesboro, N.C., Bobbie J Barmer, Michael P Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Shinaberry v. Town of Murfreesboro, N.C. et al
as 2:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Shinaberry
Defendant:
Town of Murfreesboro, N.C. , Bobbie J Barmer, Michael P Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
