Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
EFIRD v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTY SHERIFF SAMUEL SCOTT PAGE et al
as 1:2024cv00332
Plaintiff: Kyle, Estate of Kepley
Defendant: Rockingham County Sheriff Samuel Scott Page and Southern Health Partners, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
EURY et al v. JENNINGS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00689
Plaintiff: ROBERT EURY, JOELLA EURY and JOELLA LEE-EURY
Defendant: KIMBERLY JENNINGS, SEDGEFIELD GARDEN APARTMENTS doing business as SEDGEFIELD REALTY COMPANY LLC and BENENSON REAL ESTATE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ESTATE OF JOSEPH LOPEZ v. HAMILTON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00421
Plaintiff: ESTATE OF JOSEPH LOPEZ
Defendant: MATTHEW HAMILTON and CITY OF GREENSBORO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LIGHT v. POLLOCK et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00059
Plaintiff: JAQUYN O'NEILL LIGHT and ESTATE OF JAQUYN O'NEILL LIGHT
Defendant: MARCUS POLLOCK, JEFF PRITCHARD and CITY OF GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THE ESTATE OF JOHN MARK HENDRICK, JR. v. BARTRUG, III et al
as 1:2020cv00778
Defendant: MATTHEW JACOB SHELTON, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA and BARRY LEE BARTRUG, III
Plaintiff: THE ESTATE OF JOHN MARK HENDRICK, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDREWS v. WOOD REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2016cv00603
Plaintiff: VETINA L. ANDREWS
Defendant: WOOD REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, L.L.C. and WOOD PARTNERS, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ARMSTRONG et al v. THE VILLAGE OF PINEHURST et al
as 1:2013cv00407
Defendant: THE VILLAGE OF PINEHURST , OFFICER JERRY MCDONALD , OFFICER TINA S. SHEPPARD and others
Plaintiff: THE ESTATE OF RONALD H. ARMSTRONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?