Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 21 - 30 of 57
PIERCE v. SMITH et al
as 1:2016cv00553
Plaintiff: CHARLES WAYNE PIERCE
Defendant: TIMMOTHY D. SMITH and DAVID GRICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAREY, et al v. JAMES S. FARRIN, P.C. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00542
Plaintiff: JAMES WEAVER GAREY , WILLIAM PARKER GAREY and AARON KENT CRUTHIS
Defendant: JAMES S. FARRIN, P.C. , MARCARI, RUSSOTTO, SPENCER & BALABAN, P.C. , RIDDLE & BRANTLEY, L.L.P and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PIERCE v. FRANK
as 1:2016cv00384
Plaintiff: CHARLES WAYNE PIERCE
Defendant: GARY W. FRANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00752
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00752
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CUMMINGS v. POWELL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00545
Plaintiff: JOHN D. CUMMINGS
Defendant: CATHY POWELL, CROSS POINT CHURCH OF GREENSBORO, CLINT S. MORSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. USA
as 1:2015cv00460
Petitioner: RICHARD DARIN PIERCE
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
JOHNSON v. BRITT et al
as 1:2013cv01067
Plaintiff: CHARLETTE DUFRAY JOHNSON
Defendant: EARL BRITT, JASON CROWLEY, GASTON WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01004
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
PIERCE EL-BEY v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00285
Plaintiff: TORNELLO FONTAINE PIERCE EL-BEY
Defendant: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA , GUILFORD COUNTY , MECKLENBURG COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?