Cases 21 - 30 of 153
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00249
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. CLARK et al
as 1:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
SHAWN THOMAS
Defendant:
JEFFREY HOWARD CLARK and UPSTAGING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
BURNETT v. OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF et al
as 1:2022cv00268
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL P. BURNETT
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF, FORSYTH COUNTY DETENTION SERVICES BUREAU, FORSYTH COUNTY DETENTION JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEBANE v. CLARK et al
as 1:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MEBANE, LARRY JUNIOR MERIS and RAYMOND SCHOFIELD HYATT
Defendant:
SERGEANT CLARK, CAPTAIN JOHNSON, CAPTAIN SELLERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MERIS v. SOUTHERN
as 1:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
LARRY MERIS
Defendant:
J.P. SOUTHERN, CUPID, K. CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. MARKELL et al
as 1:2021cv00917
Plaintiff:
EMANUEL LAMONT CLARK ALLEN
Defendant:
RYAN MARKELL and DARRELL STILLWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. FISCHER et al
as 1:2021cv00923
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Defendant:
J. CLARK FISCHER, FORSYTH COUNTY, JIM O'NELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEBANE v. FLOYD et al
as 1:2021cv00878
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MEBANE
Defendant:
JOE FLOYD, LIEUTENANT NELSON, CORPORAL TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWTON v. BRITT et al
as 1:2021cv00853
Plaintiff:
JAMES EARL NEWTON
Defendant:
CAPTAIN BRITT, SERGEANT CLARK, SERGEANT BRIDGES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
