Cases 21 - 30 of 43
BLACK v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv01025
Plaintiff:
LISA BLACK
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BLACK V. OAK RIDGE FINANCIAL SERVICES,INC., ET AL.
as 1:2017cv01006
Plaintiff:
RONALD O. BLACK
Defendant:
OAK RIDGE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. , BANK OF OAK RIDGE , BANK OF OAK RIDGE AMENDED CEO NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
GOODWIN v. CLARK, ET AL.
as 1:2015cv00458
Plaintiff:
WESLEY FOUST-GRAHAM GOODWIN
Defendant:
SUSAN KELLY GOODWIN CLARK, NC STATE BAR, NORMAN B. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MCDANIEL v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2015cv00017
Plaintiff:
TIGRESS SYDNEY ACUTE MCDANIEL
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, 18TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA AND GUILFORD COUNTY, CITY OF GREENSBORO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
FOH v. CHASE et al
as 1:2014cv00928
Plaintiff:
MUNJE BETTY FOH
Defendant:
MARGARET M. CHASE, MICHAEL C TALIERCIO, ROSSABI BLACK SLAUGHTER PA, ATTORNEYS AT LAW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JENKINS v. FEDERAL MEDIAL CENTER et al
as 1:2014cv00707
Plaintiff:
ARDELL L. JENKINS
Defendant:
FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER, WARDEN, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLACK v. THE UNITED STATES ARMY et al
as 1:2013cv00889
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM REID BLACK
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES ARMY, ARMY REVIEW BOARD AGENCY, PULSON and others
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1552
BLACK v. EVANS
as 1:2013cv00321
Plaintiff:
JOHN D. BLACK
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER EVANS
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
