Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00676
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
SIMMONS v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2011cv00636
Petitioner:
EARNEST J. SIMMONS
Respondent:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NELSON v. NC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2011cv00626
Petitioner:
SCOTT OWEN NELSON
Respondent:
NC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2011cv00470
Plaintiff:
LANCE A. JONES
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
BEASLEY v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2011cv00446
Plaintiff:
MARION BEASLEY, JR.
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, ERIC JONES, JOEL HERRON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOLDMAN v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
as 1:2011cv00242
Petitioner:
LANCE ADAM GOLDMAN
Respondent:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SAPP v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DIVISION OF PRISONS
as 1:2011cv00181
Petitioner:
DONALD LEE SAPP, JR.
Respondent:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DIVISION OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
OWENS-BEY v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2010cv00952
Petitioner:
DAMON OWENS-BEY
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and CASWELL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION ENTERPRISE
as 1:2010cv00835
Plaintiff:
BILLY HARRIS SMITH
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION ENTERPRISE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POWELL v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2010cv00793
Petitioner:
JAMES POWELL
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, ALVIN KELLER and SANDRA THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
