Cases 31 - 40 of 43
FULLER ET AL V. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY ET AL
as 1:2013cv00144
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL G. FULLER, DAVID A. HOSKINS, ERIC A. GAYTON and others
Defendant:
YOLANDA M. GAUSE, SGT. COVETON, SGT. CHAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YNOT, LLC et al v. VANTAGESOUTH BANK et al
as 1:2012cv01384
Plaintiff:
YNOT, LLC and SUSAN M. HUTSON
Defendant:
VANTAGESOUTH BANK , LARRY SHARPE and STUART SIOUSSAT
Counter_claimant:
LARRY SHARPE , VANTAGESOUTH BANK and STUART SIOUSSAT
Counter_defendant:
SUSAN M. HUTSON and YNOT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to BK. Case
SHARP v. USA
as 1:2012cv00049
Petitioner:
SCOTT LEE SHARP
Respondent:
ENC HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DAVIS v. SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
as 1:2011cv01041
Defendant:
SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
RONNELL C. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
HENDERSON v. EDWARDS et al
as 1:2011cv00445
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY LEN HENDERSON
Defendant:
FREDDRICK EDWARDS, MUHAMMAD SHARPE, NORTH CAROLINA DEPT. OF CORR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENDERSON v. EDWARDS et al
as 1:2011cv00314
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY LEN HENDERSON
Defendant:
FREDDRICK EDWARDS and MUHAMMAD SHARPE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAY v. SHARP
as 1:2010cv00891
Plaintiff:
PERCY LEE CLAY and DIANE CLAY
Defendant:
P. TREVOR SHARP
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
SHARP v. CAMERON
as 1:2009cv00539
Petitioner:
SCOTT LEE SHARP
Respondent:
ED CAMERON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SWEAT v. WAGONER et al
as 1:2009cv00063
Plaintiff:
KENON DURELL SWEAT
Defendant:
ANNA MILLS WAGONER, KEARNS DAVIS, KIM GARRETT and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
