Cases 31 - 37 of 37
MCLEAN v. OLIGMUELLER et al
as 1:2009cv00953
Plaintiff:
LUCIUS ELWOOD MCLEAN
Defendant:
L.A. OLIGMUELLER, JR., DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE, B.J. BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARVEY v. GUILFORD COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
as 1:2009cv00870
Plaintiff:
GREGORY HARVEY
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
HEMINGWAY-EL v. GUILFORD COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE
as 1:2009cv00772
Plaintiff:
NOBLE DWAYNE HEMINGWAY-EL
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
CANO v. GUILFORD COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE
as 1:2009cv00820
Plaintiff:
BRIAN BENITEZ CANO
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, GUILFORD COUNTY OFFICE OF THE DEFENDER DIS #18 and GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT. OF DETENTION BUREAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ESPINDOLA v. GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. OF DETENTION BUREAU
as 1:2009cv00640
Plaintiff:
MISAEL GARCIA ESPINDOLA
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, GUILFORD COUNTY OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENDER and GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. OF DETENTION BUREAU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NUNEZ v. GUILFORD COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE et al
as 1:2009cv00643
Plaintiff:
MARIO PADILLO NUNEZ
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, GUILFORD COUNTY OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER and GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. OF DETENTION BUREAU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ v. GUILFORD COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE et al
as 1:2009cv00642
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO CORTES RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, GUILFORD COUNTY OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER and GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. OF DETENTION BUREAU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
