Cases 31 - 40 of 47
LINDSEY-BEY v. HARRISON et al
as 1:2012cv01028
Plaintiff:
MAREESE LINDSEY-BEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL HARRISON, CHARLES ODOM, PISONDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRISON v. FIRST BANK
as 1:2012cv00567
Plaintiff:
JEFF HARRISON
Defendant:
FIRST BANK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
ADAMS, et al v. CITICORP CREDIT SERVICES, INC. (USA)
as 1:2012cv00286
Plaintiff:
HENRY DENNIS ADAMS , KELLY HARRISON , JAMES E. WHITFIELD, JR. and others
Defendant:
CITICORP CREDIT SERVICES, INC. (USA)
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
FOCUS OF GEORGIA, INC. v. STAFFCO MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC., et al
as 1:2011mc00017
Plaintiff:
FOCUS OF GEORGIA, INC.
Defendant:
STAFFCO MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC., MARK F. GRIFFIN, WILLIAM RAY MCDANIEL and others
CAIN et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
as 1:2010cv00866
Plaintiff:
BRENDA CAIN , AUSTIN RODDEN , BROOKE TOMPKINS and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUNT v. NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF PRISONS
as 1:2010cv00730
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HARRISON HUNT, JR.
Respondent:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARRISON v. SOUTHEASTERN RADIOLOGY, PA
as 1:2010cv00605
Plaintiff:
LESLIE A. HARRISON
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN RADIOLOGY, PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
WOODS v. COUNTY OF WILSON et al
as 1:2010cv00474
Plaintiff:
ISAAC LEE WOODS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF WILSON, WILSON COUNTY MANAGER, WAYNE GAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
HARRISON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2010cv00018
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
LAKESHA R. HARRISON
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
