Cases 31 - 39 of 39
ABBITT v. CITY OF WINSTON SALEM
as 1:2012cv00994
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH L. ABBITT
Defendant:
CITY OF WINSTON SALEM , SCOTT CUNNINGHAM , PATRICIA D. NORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAGE et al v. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv00900
Defendant:
SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. , US NATIONAL BANK ASSOCIATION and JOHN AND JANE DOES (1 THROUGH 25)
Plaintiff:
ROSINA MARIE PAGE and JERCKARRA PAGE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00752
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
HARRIS et al v. SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., et al
as 1:2012cv00378
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L. HARRIS, III and ADRIANE L. HARRIS
Defendant:
SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC. , SUNTRUST BANKS INC. , SUNTRUST BANK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00169
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
LORE, et al v. WILKES, et al
as 1:2012cv00165
Plaintiff:
DAVID EDWARD LORE, JR. and ANGELA LORE
Defendant:
SANDRA WILKES, KRIS SAPPER, KEVIN AUTEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEVELS v. FREEMONT INVESTMENT & LOAN, et al
as 1:2011cv00882
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD NEVELS
Defendant:
FREEMONT INVESTMENT & LOAN, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC and JOHN AND JANE DOES (1 THROUGH 25)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
TATE v. JONES
as 1:2010cv00616
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE EDMOND TATE
Defendant:
JONES, SAMI HASAN, JENNIFER LANGLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JANE DOES 1-2 v. NORTH CAROLINA BAPTIST HOSPITAL, et al
as 1:2009cv00012
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA BAPTIST HOSPITAL, NORTH CAROLINA BAPTIST HOSPITAL, NORTH CAROLINA BAPTIST HOSPITAL AND APPLICABLE AFFILIATES GROUP HEALTH PLAN and others
Plaintiff:
JANE DOES 1-2
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
