Cases 31 - 40 of 96
GLENN v. POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF DURHAM et al
as 1:2020cv00634
Plaintiff:
GURLEY E. GLENN
Defendant:
CHIEF CERELYN DAVIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF DURHAM, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FARMER v. DOE #1 et al
as 1:2019cv01111
Plaintiff:
DEE DEIDRE FARMER
Defendant:
DUKE REGIONAL HOSPITAL and JANE DOE #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SWINNEY v. FRONTIER AIRLINES, INC., et al
as 1:2019cv00808
Defendant:
ABC CORPORATION 1-5, JANE DOE AND JOHN DOE 1-10, INDIGO PARTNERS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROSETTA SWINNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOORE v. LASSITER et al
as 1:2019cv00774
Defendant:
NORMA MELTON, KENNETH LASSITER, JEFFERY PATANE and others
Plaintiff:
BENSON MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
BECK v. HURWITZ, et al.
as 1:2019cv00488
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE, HUGH J. HURWITZ and others
Plaintiff:
ANGELA M. BECK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MORENO v. RUSSELL et al
as 1:2019cv00360
Defendant:
KIM RUSSELL, JOHN DOE 1-10 and JANE DOE 1-10
Plaintiff:
MANUEL MORENO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUNCAN v. SCHATZMAN et al
as 1:2019cv00353
Defendant:
K. ADAMS, SABEL CALDWELL, WENDY HOGAN and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN TORREY DUNCAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHORE et al v. THE CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG HOSPITAL AUTHORITY D/B/A CAROLINAS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM et al
as 1:2018cv00961
Plaintiff:
LISA ENGEL, LYDIA WALKER, DELLA SHORE and others
Defendant:
MEDCOST BENEFIT SERVICES, LLC, MEDCOST LLC, MEMBERS OF THE ATRIUM HEALTH RETIREMENT COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
RICE v. NC DISTRICT JUDGE (JANE DOE) et al
as 1:2018cv00861
Defendant:
NC DISTRICT JUDGE (JANE DOE) and SUPERVISING OFFICIALS AT GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
