Cases 31 - 40 of 52
KRUGER et al v. NOVANT HEALTH, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv00208
Plaintiff:
KAROLYN KRUGER, M.D. , CANDACE CULTON , FRANCES BAILLIE and others
Defendant:
NOVANT HEALTH, INC. , ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE OF NOVANT HEALTH, INC. , NOVANT HEALTH RETIREMENT PLAN COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
POWELL v. USA
as 1:2013cv01052
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
TRAVIS DWAYNE POWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MCSWAIN v. JOBS
as 1:2013cv00890
Plaintiff:
ANDRE J. MCSWAIN
Defendant:
LAURENE POWELL JOBS , APPLE INC. and GOOGLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
RHODES et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 1:2013cv00864
Plaintiff:
JAMES NATHAN RHODES and PAMELA SUSAN RHODES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, A.O. SMITH CORPORATION , AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WASHINGTON v. POWELL
as 1:2013cv00679
Plaintiff:
JAMES WASHINGTON
Defendant:
POWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOGAN et al v. AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv01353
Plaintiff:
RALPH EARL LOGAN and LOIS LOGAN
Defendant:
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC., BW/IP INTERNATIONAL, INC., CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
POWELL v. USA
as 1:2012cv01345
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
IVAN CLIFTON POWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
VAUGHAN v. 3M COMPANY, et al
as 1:2012cv01231
Plaintiff:
GENEVA D. VAUGHAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, A.O. SMITH CORPORATION, AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ANGUS v. USA FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2012cv00997
Plaintiff:
DANNY K. ANGUS
Defendant:
USA FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ZINETA DEDOVIC, JACK LUTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ANGUS v. MUELLER, et al
as 1:2012cv00821
Plaintiff:
DANNY K. ANGUS
Defendant:
ROBERT S. MUELLER, ZINETA DEDOVIC, JACK LUTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
