Cases 31 - 40 of 270
COVINGTON et al v. ELLERBEE et al
as 1:2022cv00674
Plaintiff:
MARCUS WAYNE COVINGTON
Defendant:
JOHNNY HAWKINS, JUSTIN ELLERBEE, JASON GOODWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COVINGTON v. HAWKINGS et al
as 1:2022cv00672
Plaintiff:
MARCUS WAYNE COVINGTON
Defendant:
JOHNNY HAWKINGS and DEPUTY CHARLES MCFALLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOYCE v. BUFFALOE
as 1:2022cv00629
Petitioner:
EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE
Respondent:
EDDIE BUFFALOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COVINGTON v. HAWKINGS et al
as 1:2022cv00528
Plaintiff:
MARCUS WAYNE COVINGTON
Defendant:
JOHNNY HAWKINGS and DEPUTY CHARLES MCFALLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAIRSTON v. TALLEY et al
as 1:2022cv00500
Plaintiff:
PAULICKIA JAZZMUN HAIRSTON
Defendant:
BRIAN K. TALLEY, JEROME PALMENTERI, WAYNE SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOYCE v. BRAY
as 1:2022cv00477
Plaintiff:
EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE
Defendant:
WARDEN BRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BA-PAKAL LUMA NATION v. STROUD et al.
as 1:2022cv00390
Plaintiff:
BA-PAKAL LUMA NATION and Black Feather and Coosa Nation, a sister Nation and Juridical Personality
Defendant:
CHIEF TRAVIS STROUD, OFFICER DEVON WILLIAMSON, LIEUTENANT BRENT J. MACFARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COVINGTON v. JUDGE WILLIAM OLSTEEN JR.
as 1:2022cv00385
Plaintiff:
MARCUS WAYNE COVINGTON
Defendant:
JUDGE WILLIAM OLSTEEN JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HARRIS v. HAWKINS
as 1:2022cv00329
Petitioner:
TERRY WAYNE HARRIS
Respondent:
SHANTICIA HAWKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
