Cases 31 - 40 of 23,952
MCCANTS v. HARRISON et al
as 1:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
TRAVUS MCCANTS
Defendant:
CHUM HARRISON, FNU WOODARD, FNU NEALY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. WINSTON SALEM NORTH CAROLINA DEA FEDERAL NARCOTIC AGENTS
as 1:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
JUSTICE SMITH
Defendant:
WINSTON SALEM NORTH CAROLINA DEA FEDERAL NARCOTIC AGENTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SMITH v. GREENSBORO NORTH CAROLINA DEA FEDERAL NARCOTIC AGENTS
as 1:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
JUSTICE SMITH
Defendant:
GREENSBORO NORTH CAROLINA DEA FEDERAL NARCOTIC AGENTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
COSTON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00461
Petitioner:
CARL YOUNG COSTON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
BYRAM v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
as 1:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BYRAM
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfers Act
PDII, LLC v. AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
PDII, LLC
Defendant:
SKY AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE, LLC, SKY AVIATION HOLDINGS, LLC and TBO EXTENSION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
ELLIS v. LEONARD et al
as 1:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JERMAINE ELLIS
Defendant:
C. LEONARD, RONNIE BEST, JAMES FURLOW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGILL v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2024cv00447
Petitioner:
MELISSA GRIFFIN MCGILL
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WALL v. USA
as 1:2024cv00443
Petitioner:
RODNEY EDWARD WALL
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
GREEN v. USA
as 1:2024cv00444
Petitioner:
MICHAEL JUSTIN GREEN
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
