Cases 41 - 50 of 353
JONES v. USA
as 1:2022cv00650
Petitioner:
GORDON RAY JONES, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
DIAZ-OTERO v. JOHNSTON et al
as 1:2022cv00648
Plaintiff:
LUIS DIAZ-OTERO
Defendant:
TERRY JOHNSTON, OFFICER J. JONES and SGT SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. GOLDS GYM - BURLINGTON et al
as 1:2022cv00574
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
GOLDS GYM - BURLINGTON, GOLDS GYM - CHAPEL HILL, CHAPEL HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
JONES v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00466
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JONES
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
BARNOCKY v. LEE et al
as 1:2022cv00436
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. BARNOCKY, JR.
Defendant:
MR. LEE, MS. JONES, MS. THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SIMERSON v. TODD et al
as 1:2022cv00419
Plaintiff:
TERRY SIMERSON
Defendant:
JONATHAN TODD, SIMMONS, CURRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. USA
as 1:2022cv00343
Petitioner:
CRAIG QUINZEL JONES
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00249
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
JONES v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
as 1:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
LINDA M. JONES
Defendant:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
