Cases 41 - 50 of 391
HAIRSTON v. TALLEY et al
as 1:2022cv00500
Plaintiff:
PAULICKIA JAZZMUN HAIRSTON
Defendant:
BRIAN K. TALLEY, JEROME PALMENTERI, WAYNE SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARTER v. ALAMANCE COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY
as 1:2022cv00493
Plaintiff:
KEITH K. CARTER
Defendant:
ALAMANCE COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JORDAN et al v. LINDBERG
as 1:2022cv00483
Plaintiff:
JAMES JORDAN, CBS INSURANCE, INC., EMPLOYERS FIRST CHOICE INSURANCE SERVICES INC. and others
Defendant:
GREG E. LINDBERG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
MEYERS v. LOCKLEAR
as 1:2022cv00348
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, WILLIAM BULLARD, LT. MR. BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOYCE v. PUGH
as 1:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE
Defendant:
RICHARD K. PUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
WALL v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY ADULT CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2022cv00169
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL K. WALL
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY ADULT CORRECTIONS and MS. MELANIE SHELTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. AUTEN et al
as 1:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
KEVIN AUTEN, JOHN DOE #2, K-9 OFFICER JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. HAMPTON et al
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DHO REGINA HAMPTON, SGT. MS. NEALLY, CAPTAIN MR. COVINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MERIS v. SOUTHERN
as 1:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
LARRY MERIS
Defendant:
J.P. SOUTHERN, CUPID, K. CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
