Cases 51 - 60 of 608
COMMON CAUSE et al v. MOORE et al
as 1:2022cv00611
Plaintiff:
COMMON CAUSE, ELIZABETH MARION SMITH, SETH EFFRON and others
Defendant:
TIMOTHY K. MOORE and PHILLIP E. BERGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JORDAN et al v. LINDBERG
as 1:2022cv00483
Plaintiff:
JAMES JORDAN, CBS INSURANCE, INC., EMPLOYERS FIRST CHOICE INSURANCE SERVICES INC. and others
Defendant:
GREG E. LINDBERG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ALLEN v. TALLEY et al
as 1:2022cv00440
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
JENNIFER TALLEY, RENEE WARD, MEGAN M. GARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
SPRY v. SCDC INSTITUTION
as 1:2022cv00423
Plaintiff:
KENYA E. SPRY
Defendant:
SCDC INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (USA)
as 1:2022cv00406
Plaintiff:
Mr. Foster E. Steen and FOSTER EZELL STEEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (USA)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
ROUSE v. SAMPSON et al.
as 1:2022cv00375
Plaintiff:
Tony Rouse
Defendant:
Dr. Harrell Sampson, TODD E. ISHEE, HEAD NURSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. LOCKLEAR
as 1:2022cv00348
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, WILLIAM BULLARD, LT. MR. BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BROWN v. USA
as 1:2022cv00313
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE E. BROWN, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
