Cases 51 - 60 of 100
PALMER v. CASWELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2013cv00492
Plaintiff:
LINDA PALMER
Defendant:
CASWELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA , MICHAEL L. WELCH , COLE EDWARDS and others
Mediator:
THOMAS C. DUNCAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'SHIELDS v. SMITH
as 1:2013cv00483
Petitioner:
DAVID YOUNG O'SHIELDS
Respondent:
LEWIS SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Palmer v. CASWELL COUNTY et al
as 1:2013cv00478
Plaintiff:
Linda Palmer
Defendant:
CASWELL COUNTY, MICHAEL WELCH, Cole Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
BIGELOW v. YOUNG
as 1:2013cv00377
Petitioner:
MAURICE L. BIGELOW
Respondent:
REUBEN F. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WARREN v. YOUNG
as 1:2013cv00072
Petitioner:
SEAN DEREK WARREN
Respondent:
REUBEN F. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PAGAN v. YOUNG
as 1:2013cv00009
Petitioner:
TRAVIS PAGAN
Respondent:
REUBAN YOUNG and N.C. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON et al v. WILLIS et al
as 1:2012cv01376
Plaintiff:
WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON and STEVE HOLLAND
Defendant:
TIMOTHY WILLIS, RONALD H. PEELER, BUNTING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. YOUNG
as 1:2012cv01281
Petitioner:
MARLITA AYESHA WILLIAMS
Respondent:
REUBEN YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLINGHAM v. SUMMERS, et al
as 1:2012cv01104
Plaintiff:
CHARLES D. WILLINGHAM
Defendant:
LYNN C. SUMMERS, K. SANDBACK, ROBERT C. LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. LEGRAND, et al
as 1:2012cv01003
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE YOUNG
Defendant:
J. O. LEGRAND, JOHN DOE I, JOHN DOE II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
