Cases 61 - 70 of 106
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv00284
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., K. D. MACKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. TOMIN et al
as 1:2016cv00273
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
WILLIAM C. TOMIN, JR., R.M. ASHLEY, K.D. MORLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv00245
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, C.C. BLAKE, R.M ASHLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. MULLEN et al
as 1:2016cv00118
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
GRAHAM C. MULLEN, CLERK OF COURT ASHEVILLE WESTERN DISTRICT USDC, CLERKS OF COURT RUTHERFORDTON NC DISTRICT AND SUPERIOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COMPTON v. US GOVERNMENT/USA et al
as 1:2015cv00904
Plaintiff:
TRAE JAVAR COMPTON
Defendant:
US GOVERNMENT/USA, ERIC HOLDER, GRAHAM GREEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COMPTON v. US GOVERNMENT/USA et al
as 1:2015cv00798
Plaintiff:
TRAE JAVAR COMPTON
Defendant:
US GOVERNMENT/USA, GRAHAM GREEN, ATF, ETAL AGENTS UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COMPTON v. GREEN et al
as 1:2015cv00501
Plaintiff:
TRAE JAVAR COMPTON
Defendant:
GRAHAM GREEN, AMES CHAMBERLIN, THOMAS D. SCHROEDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOODWIN v. CLARK, ET AL.
as 1:2015cv00458
Plaintiff:
WESLEY FOUST-GRAHAM GOODWIN
Defendant:
SUSAN KELLY GOODWIN CLARK, NC STATE BAR, NORMAN B. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
COVINGTON et al v. THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2015cv00399
Plaintiff:
SANDRA LITTLE COVINGTON , HERMAN BENTHLE LEWIS, JR. , VIOLA RYALS FIGUEROA and others
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ROBERT A. RUCHO, PHILIP E. BERGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. USA
as 1:2014cv00719
Petitioner:
CARL KOTAY GRAHAM
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
