Cases 61 - 70 of 118
Soltes v. Board of Directors of Woods Charter School Company
as 1:2016cv00120
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eugene Soltes
Defendant:
Board of Directors of Woods Charter School Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FERGUSON v. BOWMAN et al
as 1:2015cv01007
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH STANTON FERGUSON
Defendant:
BOWMAN, ALLEN, WOODS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOODS v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv00763
Plaintiff:
CARMELENE LYNNE WOODS
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
GOODWIN v. CLARK, ET AL.
as 1:2015cv00458
Plaintiff:
WESLEY FOUST-GRAHAM GOODWIN
Defendant:
SUSAN KELLY GOODWIN CLARK, NC STATE BAR, NORMAN B. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
WOOD v. GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv00045
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN S. WOOD
Defendant:
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, GENERAL DYNAMICS ADVANCED INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., GENERAL DYNAMICS ADVANCED TECHONOLOGY SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
WOOD v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv00002
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL W. WOOD
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
WOOD et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv01004
Plaintiff:
ETHEL THOMAS WOOD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
WOOD v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv00774
Plaintiff:
JAMES EUGENE WOOD
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
WOODS et al v. CITY OF GREENSBORO et al
as 1:2014cv00767
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WOODS , RAMONA WOODS and BNT AD AGENCY, LLC
Defendant:
CITY OF GREENSBORO , TONY WILKINS , NANCY HOFFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
