Cases 1 - 10 of 62
VOE et al v. MANSFIELD et al
as 1:2023cv00864
Plaintiff:
VICTOR VOE, VANESSA VOE, VANCE VOE and others
Defendant:
THOMAS MANSFIELD, MICHAUX R. KILPATRICK, MD, PHD, CHRISTINE M. KHANDELWAL, DO and others
Intervenor Defendant:
PHILIP E. BERGER and TIMOTHY K. MOORE
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
ELLIS v. CABARRUS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 1:2022cv00573
Plaintiff:
SHAWN PATRICK ELLIS
Defendant:
CABARRUS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, KEVIN M. KLINGLESMITH, JOSHUA HELMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARRINGTON v. SHARF et al
as 1:2022cv00424
Plaintiff:
THEODORE MACON CARRINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
DR. A. SHARF, DR. STRIBLING RILEY, FBOP (FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PORTER v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv00573
Defendant:
MARTIN B. MCGEE, KEVIN PFISTER, JAMES ROMINGER and others
Plaintiff:
DONAT CALEB PORTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
RILEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv00225
Petitioner:
CARLOS ANTONIO RILEY, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RILEY v. USA
as 1:2019cv00979
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
CARLOS ANTONIO RILEY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
RILEY v. FIDELITY INVESTMENTS GROUP EMPLOYEE SHORT-TERM DISABILITY PLAN - 530, et al
as 1:2019cv00953
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, MEDICAL REVIEW INSTITUTE OF AMERICA, LLC, FMR LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHANA RILEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
KIMBLE v. RILEY
as 1:2018cv00958
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM KIMBLE
Defendant:
BRAD RILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KIMBLE v. RILEY
as 1:2018cv00780
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM KIMBLE
Defendant:
BRAD RILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. BARCELLONA et al
as 1:2018cv00486
Plaintiff:
MILO DANIEL TYLER
Defendant:
TOM BARCELLONA, R. B. HARKEY, SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
