Cases 1 - 10 of 252
HOLSEY-HYMAN v. CITY OF DURHAM et al
as 1:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Monique Holsey-Hyman
Defendant:
CITY OF DURHAM, Kimberly Rehberg, Mark Anthony Middleton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
CUNNINGHAM v. WALLACE & GRAHAM, P.A. et al
as 1:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
CRAIG CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
Bill Graham, Joel R Rhine, P Mark Doby and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
ALLEN v. COOPER et al
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
ROY COOPER, N.C. STATE BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, JENNIFER ELWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
SCARBOROUGH v. USA
as 1:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
MARK ALAN SCARBOROUGH
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
COLEMAN v. MAUNEY et al
as 1:2023cv01127
Plaintiff:
DEANNA COLEMAN and AUGUSTINE PEREZ
Defendant:
CHASE MAUNEY, SHERIFF SAMUEL SCOTT PAGE, ADAM D MOSQUEDA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
JOYCE v. MAURY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 1:2023cv00707
Plaintiff:
EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE
Defendant:
MAURY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, WARDEN BRAY and MARK WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TYLER v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Defendant:
DAVID B. SMITH, THE FORSYTH COUNTY L.E.D.C, ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOYCE v. WILSON
as 1:2023cv00610
Plaintiff:
EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE
Defendant:
MARK WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
