Cases 1 - 10 of 20
TURNER v. ENNIS et al
as 1:2023cv00737
Defendant:
JIM BROWN, MICAH ENNIS, ROAWN COUNTY COURTHOUSE and others
Plaintiff:
MATILDA TURNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00736
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
BRUEHL v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2021cv00590
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BRUEHL, M.D.
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
INDIANA PAIN AND SPINE CLINIC, LLC et al v. CAROLINA LIQUID CHEMISTRIES CORPORATION et al
as 1:2021cv00543
Plaintiff:
AMIR KAZI and INDIANA PAIN AND SPINE CLINIC, LLC
Defendant:
MR. PHIL SHUGART, MRS. PATRICIA SHUGART and CAROLINA LIQUID CHEMISTRIES CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01009
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE SOUTHEAST v. COBB CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC, PA et al
as 1:2016cv01335
Defendant:
COBB CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC, PA and SHATERIKA A. NICHOLSON
Plaintiff:
SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE SOUTHEAST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NICHOLSON V. COBB CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC, PA.
as 1:2016cv01004
Defendant:
COBB CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC, PA
Plaintiff:
SHATERIKA NICHOLSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WILLIAMSON v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2016cv00241
Plaintiff:
PENNY WILLIAMSON
Defendant:
SUSAN ROBERTS, NPC and OPTUM CLINICAL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
