Cases 1 - 10 of 128
KING v. ALAMANCE DISTRICT ATTORNEY et al
as 1:2024cv00426
Petitioner:
ROBERT CHARLES ANTHONY KING
Respondent:
ALAMANCE DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SEAN BOONE, MAGGIE BREWER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BANKS v. ROSS et al
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BANKS
Defendant:
RYAN ROSS, ELIZABETH WATERS, MICHAEL HUGGINS and others
BANKS v. ROSS et al
as 1:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BANKS
Defendant:
RYAN ROSS, ELIZABETH WATERS, KELLYCE HEBERT and others
DODSON et al v. WAGNER CONSULTING GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
JOHN DODSON, SCOTT TURNER, JOSEPH GALLAGHER and others
Defendant:
WAGNER CONSULTING GROUP, INC. and JONATHAN BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
TEASLEY v. O'BRIEN
as 1:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
KENYA TEASLEY
Defendant:
ELIZABETH O'BRIEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
HOOVER v. WADDELL et al
as 1:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER
Defendant:
STEPHEN WADDELL, ROY A. COOPER III, ELIZABETH N. STRICKLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
AYDLETT et al v. NISSAN OF ELIZABETH CITY, LLC
as 1:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
BERNADETTE AYDLETT and ERICA AYDLETT
Defendant:
NISSAN OF ELIZABETH CITY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
