Cases 1 - 10 of 22
ELLIS v. CABARRUS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 1:2022cv00573
Plaintiff:
SHAWN PATRICK ELLIS
Defendant:
CABARRUS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, KEVIN M. KLINGLESMITH, JOSHUA HELMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MITCHELL v. GREEN et al
as 1:2022cv00015
Petitioner:
JORDAN NATHANIEL MITCHELL
Respondent:
SGT. GREEN and DEPUTY HELMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOYCE v. SHEEN et al
as 1:2021cv00803
Plaintiff:
EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE
Defendant:
CLERK LYNDA SHEEN, REGISTER OF DEEDS ANN SHAW, SHERIFF LITCHARD HURLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES-EL v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2021cv00487
Defendant:
C. STARLING, MACRE R. CRIDER, MONICA BOND and others
Plaintiff:
HARRY SHAROD JAMES-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES-EL v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2021cv00159
Defendant:
C. STARLING, MACRE R. CRIDER, MONICA BOND and others
Plaintiff:
HARRY SHAROD JAMES-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HELMS v. FORSYTH COUNTY
as 1:2020cv01004
Respondent:
FORSYTH COUNTY
Petitioner:
MARCY LYNN HELMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PORTER v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv00573
Defendant:
MARTIN B. MCGEE, KEVIN PFISTER, JAMES ROMINGER and others
Plaintiff:
DONAT CALEB PORTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CRANFORD v. KLUTTZ et al
as 1:2015cv00987
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CRANFORD
Defendant:
EDDIE KLUTTZ and REESE HELMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. MOORE et al
as 1:2015cv00915
Plaintiff:
JORDAN NATHANIEL MITCHELL
Defendant:
VINCENT MOORE, GREEN and HELMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v. BB&T CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv00841
Plaintiff:
BREWSTER SMITH, JR , DORIS KIROUAC , CHRISTINA HAWKS and others
Defendant:
BB&T CORPORATION , BB&T CORPORATION EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PLAN COMMITTEE , BB&T CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
