Cases 1 - 10 of 357
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00766
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
BROOKS v. RICKER et al
as 1:2024cv00758
Plaintiff:
RASHAWN A. BROOKS
Defendant:
OFFICER RICKER, OFFICER EDWARDS and OFFICER JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. USA
as 1:2024cv00704
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
ROGER WAYNE JONES, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
HARRISON v. MCLEAN et al
as 1:2024cv00453
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, MR. NEU, ZERRANTI MCLEAN and others
Plaintiff:
YAW NYADU HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKS v. RICKER et al
as 1:2024cv00585
Defendant:
OFFICER EDWARDS, OFFICER RICKER and OFFICER JONES
Plaintiff:
RASHAWN A. BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. THE CITY OF GREENSBORO et al
as 1:2024cv00450
Defendant:
GREENSBORO FIRE DEPARTMENT and THE CITY OF GREENSBORO
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN ROBERT JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
BROOKS v. RICKER et al
as 1:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
RASHAWN A. BROOKS
Defendant:
OFFICER EDWARDS, SARGENT GRAHAM, OFFICER RICKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CORBETT v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
STANLEY EARL CORBETT, JR.
Defendant:
ERIK HOOKS, CHRISTOPHER RICH, KATY POOLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BIRKHEAD et al
as 1:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
BRANDON OTHA MARTIN
Defendant:
CHARLES F. BIRKHEAD, MRS. SPENCER, MRS. HOLLOWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. DEJOY
as 1:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY JONES
Defendant:
LOUIS DEJOY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
