Cases 1 - 10 of 160
SMALLWOOD v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
LAMARQUIS SMALLWOOD
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, MS. SAMPSON, SRG MS. LOCKLEAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. O.I.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
JOHN FRANK MILLER
Defendant:
LT. O.I.C., SLONG, K. FINKLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MASHORE v. NAVES
as 1:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
RODRIQUEZ DWAYNE MASHORE
Defendant:
SGT JASON JAGGER NAVES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPENCE v. TOLBERT et al
as 1:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
KENYON J. SPENCE
Defendant:
SGT. TOLBERT and SGT. LENWOOD GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMALLWOOD v. SAMPSON et al
as 1:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
LAMARQUIS SMALLWOOD
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, MS. SAMPSON, SGT. BETHAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
D.M. v. CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM et al
as 1:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
G. M.
Petitioner:
D. M.
Defendant:
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, Sgt. Kyle Krawczyk, Officer Jamison Keltner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMALLWOOD v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
LAMARQUIS SMALLWOOD
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, MS. SAMPSON, TAMARA RUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. O.I.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
JOHN FRANK MILLER
Defendant:
LT. O.I.C., OFFICER SLONG, JANE DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FREEMAN v. KIM et al
as 1:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE E. FREEMAN
Defendant:
SGT. KIM, SGT. LAURA and LUETENANT KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CORBETT v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
STANLEY EARL CORBETT, JR.
Defendant:
ERIK HOOKS, CHRISTOPHER RICH, KATY POOLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
